· 6/22/2000
Tonnessen v. Denver Publishing Co.
Citations
- 5 P.3d 959
- 28 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 2039
- 2000 Colo. J. C.A.R. 3680
- 2000 Colo. App. LEXIS 1090
- 2000 WL 796581
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- requiring that a statement “prejudice the plaintiff in the eyes of a substantial and respectable minority of the community”
- “[T]he fact that an individual has done one bad thing does not necessarily mean the individual has done another entirely separate bad act.”
- “A statement imputing a criminal offense is defamatory per se.”
- “A statement imputing a criminal offense is defamatory per se.”
- “A statement imputing a criminal offense is defamatory per se.”
- applying the incremental harm doctrine
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Rothenberg, Kapelke, Casebolt
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.