Skip to main content
· 2/8/1996

Tonnemacher v. Touche Ross & Co.

Citations

  • 920 P.2d 5
  • 186 Ariz. 125
  • 209 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 44
  • 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 18

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that discretionary stay is available, although dismissal is not
  • stating actions filed in different states invoke the authority of independent sovereigns and neither sovereign is required to yield to the other
  • finding trial court did not have discretion to dismiss claim before it that was also pending simultaneously in federal court, but did have discretion to stay the action
  • action in personam is action seeking personal judgment
  • action in rem seeks control over property

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Garbarino, Lankford, Sult

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.