· 2/8/1996
Tonnemacher v. Touche Ross & Co.
Citations
- 920 P.2d 5
- 186 Ariz. 125
- 209 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 44
- 1996 Ariz. App. LEXIS 18
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that discretionary stay is available, although dismissal is not
- stating actions filed in different states invoke the authority of independent sovereigns and neither sovereign is required to yield to the other
- finding trial court did not have discretion to dismiss claim before it that was also pending simultaneously in federal court, but did have discretion to stay the action
- action in personam is action seeking personal judgment
- action in rem seeks control over property
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Garbarino, Lankford, Sult
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.