Skip to main content
· 6/24/1965

Tonkoff v. Coscia

Citations

  • 66 Wash. 2d 925
  • 403 P.2d 668
  • 1965 Wash. LEXIS 951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that the defendant’s litigation activities spanned fifteen months
  • “Our review is de novo, but we examine any underlying factual findings for clear error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.