Tonking v. Port Authority of New York & New Jersey

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• affirming the grant of a motion to dismiss because “the language of the parties is not clear enough to enforce an obligation to indemnify”
• affirming dismissal because “the language of the parties is not clear enough to enforce an obligation to indemnify”
• “If the parties intended to cover Bovis [a non-signatory] as a potential indemnitee, they had only to say so unambiguously.”
• “If the parties intended to cover [the contractor] as a potential indemnitee, they had only to say so unambiguously.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).