Toni Toston v. Michael Thurmer

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• banning possession of Black Panther’s Ten‐Point Program, calling for freedom of all blacks in prison
• deferring to prison administrators’ safety rationale even though their justification was “not ample”
• “A deprivation of liberty without fair notice of the acts that would give rise to such a deprivation violates the due process clause[.]”
• “A deprivation of liberty without fair notice of the acts that would give rise to such a deprivation violates the due process clause[.]”
• a deprivation of liberty or property “without fair notice of the acts that would give rise to such a deprivation violates the due process clause”
• gang-activity regulation didn’t give fair warning that prisoner was forbidden from copying information from books that could be possessed in prison

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).