Tongs v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the following statement was an inquiry: “The plaintiff stated that the bid to the state was a ‘close’ one, and if possible the plaintiff would like to have the defendant ‘shave’ its figure.... ”
• \[a] mere inquiry as to whether one proposing a contract will alter or modify its terms does not amount to a rejection\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).