Skip to main content
· 1/14/1994

Tongass Sport Fishing Ass'n v. State

Citations

  • 866 P.2d 1314
  • 1994 Alas. LEXIS 4
  • 1994 WL 7759

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that the equal access clauses “are not implicated unless limits are placed on the admission to resource user groups”
  • upholding salmon harvesting regulation giving preference to commercial fishers because sport and commercial fishers are not similarly situated
  • upholding a salmon harvesting regulation that gave preference to commercial fishers because sport and commercial fishers are not similarly situated
  • upholding a salmon harvesting regulation that gave preference to commercial fishers because sport and commercial fishers are not similarly situated
  • Board’s decision favorable to commercial trailers concerning allocation of king salmon in Southeast Alaska not “unreasonable or arbitrary”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Moore, Rabinowitz, Burke, Matthews, Compton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.