Tong v. Superior Court of Cal.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the two-pronged test for a substantial change in a pre-existing development requires that there be a “cognizable physical change”
• deciding an enforcement action in which the “only dispute” was whether the respondents knew or should have known that their excavating, dredging, filling, and construction work occurred inside the wetland boundary
• explaining that bias must be “clearly established by the record”
• profit from sale of crushed rock extracted prior to obtaining Act 250 permit properly included as an economic benefit of the violation
• Court will not address issues not raised in environmental court
• preservation in appellant’s original brief

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).