Skip to main content
· 5/19/1981

Toney v. Bouthillier

Citations

  • 631 P.2d 557
  • 129 Ariz. 402
  • 1981 Ariz. App. LEXIS 465

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • finding that any consideration of fault was irrelevant in action brought pursuant to the Arizona dog-bite statute, 6 which explicitly provided for the defense of provocation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Jacobson, Haire, Eubank

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.