Skip to main content

Toms v. Toms

Citations

  • 98 S.W.3d 140
  • 2003 Tenn. LEXIS 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • interpreting the statute to authorize awards of attorney fees against intervening grandparents who were not a “spouse”
  • “Appellate courts must address the issue of subject matter jurisdiction even if the issue is not raised in the trial court.”
  • “Appellate courts must address the issue of subject matter jurisdiction even if the issue is not raised . . . .”
  • “Appellate courts must address the issue of subject matter jurisdiction even if the issue is not raised in the trial court.”
  • “We conclude that the juvenile court lost jurisdiction of the case upon the dismissal of the dependency and neglect petition . . . .
  • “We conclude that the juvenile court lost jurisdiction of the case upon the dismissal of the dependency and neglect petition . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Janice M. Holder

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

79 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

8 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Toms v. Toms

4 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.