Tompkins v. United Healthcare of New England, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• determining from a close examination of the complaint that the only discriminatory conduct actually alleged by plaintiffs was insufficient to support their ADA claim
• noting “that ‘public accommodations’ are not limited to actual physical structures, and that the discriminatory denial of benefits under a health care plan might, in some circumstances, state a claim under Title III of the ADA”
• \The complaint will survive as long as it pleads sufficient facts to warrant recovery on any cognizable theory of the case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).