Tompkins v. Eason

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that denomination requirement of Rule 74.01(a) does not apply to Rules 29.15 and 24.035
• relying on Rule 29.15(k) to find that the denomination requirement under Rule 74.01(a) is not applicable to post-conviction appeals
• application of the denomination requirement of Rule 74.01(a) runs counter to the purposes of Rules 29.15 and 24.035 and is, therefore, not applicable

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).