Tompkins v. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the outermost, 43 unfettered limit of such an easement was what was convenient or necessary for railroad operations
• use of the easement as a side track to discharge and receive freight and not as a main line still satisfied the railroad purposes requirement for the easement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).