· 6/25/1964
Tommy Martin Edwards v. United States
Citations
- 333 F.2d 588
- 1964 U.S. App. LEXIS 4901
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying plain error review because the defendant did not renew his motion for judgment of acquittal and so did not preserve his sufficiency argument
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Vogel, Matthes, Harper
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.