Tommy J. McClanahan v. Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a treating physician’s examination date is an appropriate disability onset when the overall evidence of record supports a nondisability finding before that date
• explaining that “ ‘[ojnly those specific objections to the magistrate’s report made to the district court will be preserved for appellate review; making some objections but failing to raise others will not preserve all the objections a party may have’ ”
• “During the sequential evaluation, if the claimant is found to be conclusively disabled or not disabled, the disability determination is made, and the inquiry is ended.”
• finding the plaintiff could not complain about the substance of the vocational expert’s testimony when counsel failed to cross examine the expert on the matter during the administrative hearing
• noting the substantial evidence standard allows considerable latitude to ALJ’s because it presupposes “there is a ‘zone of choice’ within which the Commissioner can act, without the fear of court interference”
• noting the substantial evidence standard allows considerable latitude to ALJ’s because it presupposes “there is a ‘zone of choice’ within which the Commissioner can act, without the fear of court interference’

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).