Tomikel v. Commonwealth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• certifying to the California Supreme Court a question implicating similar competing public policy concerns
• “Occasionally, such diametrically opposed 1 inducement claim are, as follows: (1) a misrepresentation, false representation, concealment, or 2 nondisclosure; (2) knowledge of falsity; (3) intent to defraud or induce plaintiff to enter into a 3 contract; (4) justifiable reliance; and (5
• “Stated differently, a party to a contract generally cannot recover for 20 pure economic loss — i.e., damages that are solely monetary — that resulted from a breach of contract unless he can show a violation of some independent duty arising in 21 tort.”
• “Stated differently, a party to a contract generally cannot recover for pure economic 17 loss — i.e., damages that are solely monetary — that resulted from a breach of contract unless he 18 can show a violation of some independent duty arising in tort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).