Tomikawa v. Gama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• interpreting a statute punishing “offences committed on the high seas” and rejecting proposed limited reading because “no reason is perceived why a more restricted meaning should be given to the expressions of the law, than they literally import.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).