Skip to main content
· 2/8/1995

Tomchuck v. Union Trust Co.

Citations

  • 875 F. Supp. 242
  • 1995 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1596
  • 1995 WL 55448

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[I]t is unnecessary to resolve th[e] [personal jurisdiction] issue in the context of the pending motion because the Court has the power to transfer the case, if appropriate, regardless of whether it has personal jurisdiction over the defendant.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Koeltl

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.