Tombroek v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that Rule 801(d)(1)(B) is susceptible to abuse
• noting, with respect to a prior consistent statement that, “[b]ecause there was no request for a limiting instruction, we must assume that the jury used the evidence for whatever purpose it chose, including substantive evidence of guilt.”
• “Because there was no request for a limiting instruction, we must assume that the jury used the evidence for whatever purpose it chose[.]”
• children made statements shortly after the initial report in a manner that would be expected in the early stages of an investigation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).