TOMAC v. Norton, Gale A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that the Bureau of Indian Affairs’ decision not to prepare an EIS for the construction of a gaming resort was reasonable
• finding that the agency’s decision to model impacts primarily for one pollutant was reasonable, because that pollutant was the one most likely to have a significant impact on air quality
• noting agency’s “significant discretion in determining” how it complies with NEPA’s public participation regulations in preparing EA
• stating that a tribe may be administratively terminated
• “all that can reasonably be expected” of agency conducting NEPA analysis is to analyze “impacts likely to occur”
• “all 38 that can reasonably be expected” of agency conducting NEPA analysis is to analyze “impacts likely to occur”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).