· 1/21/2003
Tomac v. Norton
Citations
- 240 F. Supp. 2d 45
- 2003 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 706
- 2003 WL 141958
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- noting that the EA failed to estimate the impact of the non-casino traffic growth generated by the 17% growth in residency expected as a result of the project
- EIS required where proposed Indian Casino would bring (1) 5,600 permanent jobs, (2) a population increase of 1,200, and (3) a potential for increased commercial development
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robertson
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.