Tom-Wat, Inc. v. Fink

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “an interlocutory appeal raises every issue presented by the order that is the subject of the appeal”
• “[B]oth Fink’s and Tom-Wat’s motions for summary judgment “present[ ] a question of law because ... the affidavits filed by the parties do not raise any factual disputes. Rather, to the extent they conflict, they do so only as to legal conclusions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).