· 11/10/1983
Tom Venable v. T.J. Haislip
Citations
- 721 F.2d 297
- 37 Fed. R. Serv. 2d 1311
- 1983 U.S. App. LEXIS 15392
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- holding that a default judgment is not appropriate if the court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter and the defendant
- holding that a default judgment is not appropriate if the court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter and the defendant
- holding that a default judgment is not appropriate if the court does not have jurisdiction over the subject matter and the defendant
- noting that a default judgment may be entered without a hearing when the amount claimed “is a liquidated sum” or “one capable of mathematical calculation”
- noting that a default judgment may be entered without a hearing when the amount claimed “is a liquidated sum” or “one capable of mathematical calculation”
- noting that a default judgment may be entered without a hearing when the amount claimed “is a liquidated sum” or “one capable of mathematical calculation”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Seth, Logan, Seymour
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.