Tom L. Scott, Inc. v. McIlhany

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a settling party could not \assign\ its experts to the opposing party, who then redesignated the experts from \testifying\ experts to \consulting-only\ experts
• holding that a settling party could not \assign\ its experts to the opposing party, who then redesignated the experts from \testifying\ experts to \consulting-only\ experts
• explaining that policy behind consulting-expert privilege is to encourage parties to seek expert advice in evaluating their case
• explaining that policy behind consulting-expert privilege is to encourage parties to seek expert advice in evaluating their case
• discussing the inability of litigants to use private agreements to block discovery of information and testimony sought by third 13 parties
• discussing inability of litigants to use private agreements to block discovery of information and testimony sought by third parties

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).