Tom James Company v. Zurich American Insurance Company

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• warning that such a \boundless\ interpretation would include almost every college and university, due to federal grants
• instructing that courts must “adhere to the plain language of the statute, rather than invoke the legislative history to embrace a reading at odds with the statutory text”
• noting that we generally do not reach arguments that parties fail to make on appeal
• concluding Amtrak is the government for purposes of the False Claims Act because “False Claims Act coverage is ... a matter within Congress’s control”
• warning that such a “boundless” interpretation would include almost every college and university, due to federal grants
• holding that arguments not raised on appeal are forfeited

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).