Tom E. MacUrdy v. Sikov & Love, P.A.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “[T]he Ohio Supreme Court held that Ohio courts confronted with conflicts of law questions should apply the analysis set forth in the Restatement (Second) of the Law of Conflicts.”
• applying law of state where misrepresentations and reliance occurred
• delay of nineteen months was held to establish prejudice
• “Accord and satisfaction is an affirmative defense.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).