Tolson v. Stanton

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that allegations that defendants had a 60% share in the print book market was insufficient to establish market power in the e-book market where the plaintiffs had made no specific allegations regarding the defendants’ market share in the e-book market
• holding that allegations that defendants had a 60% share in the print book market was insufficient to establish market power in the e-book market where the plaintiffs had made no specific allegations regarding the defendants’ market share in the e-book market
• rejecting construction of complaint that would allege harm to the U.S. market for e-books that are readable on Amazon's Kindle devices and apps
• dismissing a monopolization claim on a motion to dismiss where the “plaintiffs’ only allegation suggesting that [the defendant] possesses monopoly power is that its market share is 60%”
• continuing to use two-option framework

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).