Skip to main content
· 11/26/1969

Tolman v. Tolman

Citations

  • 461 P.2d 433
  • 93 Idaho 374
  • 1969 Ida. LEXIS 314

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that a trial judge’s statutory authority to award attorney’s fees in a pending divorce action is “unaffected by the fact that the mandate ... did not mention attorney fees”
  • stating that a trial judge's statutory authority to award attorney's fees in a pending divorce action is \unaffected by the fact that the mandate ... did not mention attorney fees\
  • stating that a trial judge’s statutory authority to award attorney’s fees in a pending divorce action is “unaffected by the fact that the mandate ... did not mention attorney fees”
  • stating that a trial judge's statutory authority to award attorney's fees in a pending divorce action is \unaffected by the fact that the mandate . . . did not mention attorney fees\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: McQuade, McFadden, Donaldson, Shepard, Spear

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.