Tolman Bros. Mfg. Co. v. Silberstein

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that the plaintiff had not adequately established that the Court should pay $25,000 to furnish the plaintiff with transcripts from a lengthy trial
• finding that \[t]here is a public interest quality to the stated goal for which the corporation was formed\ and that \there is a public interest aspect to any private suit for treble damages under the antitrust laws\
• antitrust treble-damage suit always has public-interest aspect weighing in favor of pauper status

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).