Skip to main content
· 11/21/1997

Tolliver v. Kroger Co.

Citations

  • 498 S.E.2d 702
  • 201 W. Va. 509
  • 1997 W. Va. LEXIS 247
  • 157 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2915

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • establishing intent to cause harmful or offensive contact as an element of common law battery
  • employer immunity may be overcome through showing of deliberate intention or unsafe working conditions which caused the harm
  • “ “Where the unresolved issues are primarily legal rather than factual, summary judgment is particularly appropriate.’ ” (quoting Payne v. Weston, 195 W.Va. 502, 506, 466 S.E.2d 161, 165 (1995))
  • review of a circuit court’s decision to grant partial summary judgment is plenary
  • “A motion for summary judgment should be granted only when it is clear that [sic] no genuine issue of fact to be tried and inquiry concerning the facts is not desirable to clarify the application of the law.” (internal quotations and citations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Davis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.