Tolliver v. Housing Authority of the County of Cook

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that the KCPA “does not provide a discovery provision allowing a claim under the KCPA to be tolled”
• agreeing that the KCPA statute of limitations begins “running with the occurrence of the alleged conduct constituting the violation, not the discovery of the violations”
• recognizing student was aggrieved at time he was induced to enroll in program with insufficient curriculum for licensure, not at time he discovered curriculum had been insufficient
• “The limitations period starts running when the consumer becomes aggrieved, even if he or she fails to recognize the harm.”
• “A consumer may be aggrieved under the KCPA without having suffered a direct monetary loss; acting on a statutorily defined deceptive or unconscionable practice to select a provider of covered goods or services may be enough.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).