Skip to main content

Toledo v. State

Citations

  • 2026 Ohio 1625

Syllabus

The trial court did not err in determining R.C. 5703.38 removed its subject-matter jurisdiction to consider Toledo's claims related to the state's enforcement of the spending setoff provisions of R.C. 5747.502. However, though the trial court correctly determined it lacked subject-matter jurisdiction over the matter, the trial court erroneously entered judgment \on the merits\ rather than dismissing the action. Thus, we modify the trial court's decision and judgment entry to reflect the matter is dismissed for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction.

Judges: Edelstein

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cites

18 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.