Toledo v. Sanchez-Rivera

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the category in Lane, “accessibility of judicial services,” included conduct beyond the facts of the case
• listing that to state a viable claim plaintiffs must allege “exclu[sion] from participation”
• concluding “Title II, as it applies to the class of cases implicating the right of access to public education, constitutes a valid exercise of Congress’ § 5 authority to enforce the guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment”
• concluding “Title II, as it applies to the class of cases implicating the right 7 of access to public education, constitutes a valid exercise of Congress’ § 5 authority to 8 enforce the guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment”
• applying rational basis review to educational disability discrimination claim that fell short of “outright exclusion”
• identifying court decisions as appropriate sources for determining whether constitutional violations at issue were sufficiently widespread

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).