Skip to main content
· 2/8/2000

Toledo v. Human Rights Commission

Citations

  • 726 N.E.2d 43
  • 312 Ill. App. 3d 131
  • 244 Ill. Dec. 447
  • 2000 Ill. App. LEXIS 65

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that the Act does not forbid favoritism, only favoritism because of an employee’s protected characteristic

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Cousins

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.