Skip to main content
· 5/27/2014

Toledo v. California

Citations

  • 134 S. Ct. 2673
  • 189 L. Ed. 2d 219
  • 82 U.S.L.W. 3685
  • 572 U.S. 1140
  • 2014 U.S. LEXIS 3786

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[K]nowledge in the art can merely supplement, but [can]not be a substitute for, a basic enabling disclosure.”
  • “Generally increasing the octane of the emergency fuel, however, is not commensurate with the scope of the claim limitation, which requires raising the octane number above 86.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.