· 7/27/2018
Toledo v. Byrd
Citations
- 2018 Ohio 2986
Syllabus
In a criminal damaging conviction, lack of documentary evidence to establish amount of damages for purposes of restitution is irrelevant to the question of guilt, which must be decided by the evidence produced at trial. Appellant's conviction is not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the homeowner and another person witnessed appellant banging and kicking at the glass screen door, causing it to break.
Judges: Pietrykowski
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.