Skip to main content
· 7/27/2018

Toledo v. Byrd

Citations

  • 2018 Ohio 2986

Syllabus

In a criminal damaging conviction, lack of documentary evidence to establish amount of damages for purposes of restitution is irrelevant to the question of guilt, which must be decided by the evidence produced at trial. Appellant's conviction is not against the manifest weight of the evidence where the homeowner and another person witnessed appellant banging and kicking at the glass screen door, causing it to break.

Judges: Pietrykowski

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.