Toledo, Peoria & Warsaw Railway Co. v. Head
Citations
- 62 Ill. 233
Syllabus
<p>1. Negligence—contributory. The plaintiff, working upon a bridge across defendant’s railroad track, with knowledge of án approaching train, called to his little boy, eleven years old, to lead bis horse across the track. In doing so the horse, through fright, escaped and got upon the track and was killed by the train. The proof failed to show negligence in the company : Held, that a verdict against the railroad company for the value of the horse could not be sustained; that the plaintiff was guilty of great negligence on his part, and that the law did not require a railroad company to ring a bell at such a place, it being only a farm crossing.</p>
Judges: Thornton
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.