Tokyo Marine & Fire Insurance v. Perez & Cia.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that defendant’s participation in telephone conversation with in-forum person and subsequent mailing into forum, combined with participation in meeting in forum, were “insufficient to establish purposeful availment”
• holding that “insured defendants and their insurance companies are solidarily liable” under Puerto Rico law such that an extrajudicial letter issued to the insurer is effective against the insured
• noting that defendant s in-state contact must give birth to the cause of action
• to show specific jurisdiction there must be “a demonstrable nexus between a plaintiff’s claims and a defendant’s forum-based activities”
• to show specific jurisdiction there must be “a demonstrable nexus between a plaintiff’s claims and a defendant’s forum-based activities”
• “The prescriptive term is interrupted on the date on which the defendant receives the extrajudicial claim.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).