Tokley v. State Farm Insurance Companies

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the definition of \relative\ is a provision that defines the persons to whom coverage is extended, as opposed to defining persons excluded from coverage, and is therefore an inclusionary clause
• holding that the definition of “relative” is a provision that defines the persons to whom coverage is extended, as opposed to defining persons excluded from coverage, and is therefore an inclusionary clause
• stating exclusionary clauses are interpreted strictly in favor of coverage for the insured
• stating exclusionary clauses are interpreted strictly in favor of coverage for the insured
• “[T]he State Farm policy language [‘lives with’] is not ambiguous . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).