Tokico (USA), Inc. v. Kelly

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• distinguishing Jones from case in which the ALJ simply chose among doctor’s opinions which interpreted the Guides differently in rating impairment rather than relying on a doctor’s opinion explicitly refusing to comply with the Guides
• “The need for additional treatment does not preclude a finding that a worker is at MMI.”
• “The need for additional treatment does not preclude a finding that a worker is at MMI.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).