Toepfer v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining Rehberg does not prevent claims against police that exist “independently” of the officer’s grand jury testimony
• allowing § 1983 claim to proceed to the extent that “the plaintiff can make out the elements of his § 1983 claim without resorting to the grand jury testimony”
• “When a [state official] claims absolute immunity for his grand jury testimony under Rehberg, the court should determine whether the plaintiff can make out the elements of his § 1983 claim without resorting to the grand jury testimony.”
• dealing with grand jury testimony

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).