Todres v. Freifeld

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a plaintiff lacked standing to bring a First Amendment as-applied challenge to various municipal ordinances
• explaining that “we [may] affirm on any basis supported by the record, regardless of whether the district court decided the case on that basis”
• recognizing prudential limitations on justiciability even after Lexmark and Susan B. Anthony and applying the familiar ripeness test
• holding that the plaintiff had sufficient procedural due process because, after the city sus- pended its business license, local law entitled the plaintiff to an emergency hearing before a special master and an appeal of that decision to the state trial court
• holding that similar administrative procedures satisfied due process when the party had a right to seek judicial review of the administrative decision in a Florida court that had “the power to remedy any procedural deficiencies and cure violations of due pro- cess”
• agreeing that a claim is not ripe because the plaintiff “does not allege that the City imposed a fine under that provision or that the imposition of a fine is immediately forthcoming”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).