Todorov v. DCH Healthcare Authority

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding a neurologist seeking additional privileges at a general hospital did not possess a due process interest in the procedures used to grant or deny such privileges if “there is no protected interest in the privileges”
• radiologist who sought radiology department privileges to administer and read CT head scans in order to share in supercom-petitive fees charged by staff radiologists for same service lacked antitrust standing as plaintiff sought to “reap” that which the competing CT scan radiologists enjoyed
• “Since the decision to deny Dr. Todorov’s application for privileges was a unilateral act by [the hospital], Dr. Todorov is unable to prove that the radiologists caused his injury. Thus, he cannot maintain an action against the radiologists under section 2.... ”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).