Todisco v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that defendant waived his right to a speedy trial where he filed a “general objection” to the setting of trial beyond the Rule 4 deadline “without specifying any basis” for that objection
• explaining that “a defendant may not sit idly by during the permissible one-year period while the trial court sets a trial date outside the parameters of Criminal Rule 4(C)” and that “[t]o do so constitutes acquiescence”
• “a defendant waives his right to a speedy trial if he is aware or should be aware of the fact that the trial court has set a trial date beyond the applicable time limitation, and he does not object to the trial date”
• referring to one-year limit of Indiana Criminal Rule 4(C)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).