Todd v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the same where the district court failed to identify the claims or discuss their elements and other clarity issues in the record complicated appellate re- view
• holding the same where the district court failed to identify the claims or discuss their elements and other clarity issues in the record complicated appellate re- view
• vacating a class certification order where the district court “analyzed the proposed classes under each provision [of Rule 23], but never made clear which claims the analyses refer to”
• “To be an adequate representative, a named plaintiff must be a member of the putative class and have the same interest and injury as other members.” (internal quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).