Todd v. White Lake Township

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that reports are not goods in trade, where applicant is not engaged in the sale of reports, but solely in furnishing financial reporting services, and reports are merely conduits through which services are rendered
• finding that reports are not goods in trade, where applicant is not engaged in the sale of reports, but solely in furnishing financial reporting services, and reports are merely conduit through which services are rendered
• “Although the Act does not define ‘goods,’ the definition of a ‘trademark’ in section 45 declares that it is used ‘to identify goods’ and section 2 refers to ‘goods in commerce.’”
• “Although the Act does not define ‘goods,’ the definition of a ‘trademark’ in section 45 declares that it is used ‘to identify goods’ and section 2 refers to ‘goods in commerce.’”
• “Although the Act does not define ‘goods,’ the definition of a ‘trademark’ in section 45 declares that it is used ‘to identify goods’ and section 2 refers to ‘goods in commerce.’”
• “Although the Act does not define ‘goods,’ the definition of a ‘trademark’ in section 45 declares that it is used ‘to identify goods’ and section 2 refers to ‘goods in commerce.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).