Todd v. Weikle

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• trial court correctly admitted factual portions of report and excluded opinions as to possible causes of accident
• \[E]vidence preponderates when it is more convincing to the trier of fact than the opposing evidence.\
• “[E]vidence preponderates when it is more convincing to the trier of fact than the opposing evidence.”
• “it is not the function of an appellate court to rewrite a statutory provision”
• “A familiar Maryland rule is that a defendant’s negligence may be shown by either direct or circumstantial evidence and may be inferred from all of the facts of the case.”
• \A familiar Maryland rule is that a defendant's negligence may be shown by either direct or circumstantial evidence and may be inferred from all of the facts of the case.\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).