Skip to main content
· 8/6/2014

Todd Schwanke v. Minnesota Department of Administration

Citations

  • 851 N.W.2d 591
  • 38 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 1497
  • 2014 WL 3844200
  • 2014 Minn. LEXIS 360

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • applying de novo review to the “legal question[s] of statutory interpretation” when the MGDPA is unambiguous in context (quotation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Stras

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.