Todd R. Haebe v. Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Board may overturn credibility determinations only when it has “sufficiently sound” reasons for doing so
• holding that the Board may overturn credibility determinations only when it has “sufficiently sound” reasons for doing so
• recognizing that the Board must defer to an administrative judge’s credibility determinations when they are based, e xplicitly or implicitly, on observing the demeanor of witnesses testifying at a hearing
• finding that the Board may overturn an administrative judge’s demeanor-based credibility findings only when it has “sufficiently sound” reasons for doing so
• finding that the Board may overturn an administrative judge’s demeanor-based credibility findings only when it has “sufficiently sound” reasons for doing so
• finding that the Board may overturn 10 credibility determinations that are implicitly or explicitly based on demeanor only when it has “sufficiently sound” reasons for doing so

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).