Todd M. Johnson, Sr. v. Joseph Ganim, Ron Rapice, and City of Bridgeport

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “factual disputes pertaining to the potential for disruption and defendants’ motivations in suspending and terminating plaintiff preclude summary judgment”
• concluding that factual question existed as to whether the conduct of an employee, a custodian, could lead to potential disruption where he was “not involved in policy-making decisions” and had limited interaction with other employees or the public
• \[T]he mere fact that [plaintiff] took a personal interest in the subject matter of the speech does not remove the letter from the protection of the First Amendment.\
• “[T]he mere fact that [plaintiff] took a personal interest in the subject matter of the speech does not remove the letter from the protection of the First Amendment.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).